Hello, everyone, welcome to “Inconvenient Truths”. I am your host Jennifer Zeng.
Today I will first of all show you a bombshell video, which shows that the P4 lab in Wuhan did keep live bats in it. Sky News showed a little bit of it several days ago. I found the entire, 11 minute video and translated it into English. So this is the exclusive world premiere of it.
After we watch the video, I will talk about my takeaways from it, and what we should do based on what this video tells us. I hope you can also share your thoughts about this video in the live chat area, or leave us some comments if you are watching after the live stream.
“The Story of the Construction and Research Team of The P4 Laboratory of Wuhan Institute of Virology”
Before we play the video, let me give you a little bit of background. It was created and released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences as a propaganda, or promotional video back in 2017 to mark the launch of the new Wuhan level 4 laboratory. Wuhan Institute of Virology belongs to the Chinese Academy of Sciences. I downloaded the video from the official website of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. I will put the link to this website in the comment area later. I have also archived this page, and will put the link to the archived page at the top of the comment area, in case the original page gets deleted after I release this translated video today.
Also, apart from adding English subtitles to the video, I haven’t changed anything in it. So what you’ll watch is the original, full version of it. I believe it is important to release the original version and keep it as is so that everybody can make up his or her own mind about it, so that it can be used as evidence, because it is original.
Now, without further ado, let’s watch the video together. Please make sure you read the English subtitles, as the video is in Chinese.
Transcript of the video:
Perseverance ‧ Unyielding
The Construction and Research Team of The P4 Laboratory of Wuhan Institute of Virology
Over the past three decades, new and sudden outbreaks of infectious diseases have been spreading more and more widely in the world, especially since 2003, the successive outbreaks of SARS, highly pathogenic avian influenza, Ebola and other virulent infectious diseases have caused significant impact on human public health and social development. High-level biosafety laboratories are the basic safety guarantee for the [research] of new and virulent infectious diseases.
Under the care and support of two generations of Party and State leaders, the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, through the joint efforts of many parties over the past ten years, introduced the design and key equipment through Sino-French cooperation, digested and re-innovated, the highest safety level, the only biosafety laboratory in China, the Wuhan P4 Laboratory, supplemented by BSL-2 and BSL-3 laboratories of the biosafety cluster platform for life science research. It is hailed as an aircraft carrier in the field of life science research, which reflects the basic capability and strategic position of our country in the field of life science.
Song Donglin, Vice Director, Wuhan P4 Lab of Chinese Academy of Sciences: “Biosafety laboratories are divided into four levels depending on the risk level of the pathogens we are studying. According differences in the physical containment and sealing requirements, they are divided into P1, P2, P3, P4 laboratory. This one we have is the P4 laboratory.”
Tong Xiao, Head of Equipment Maintenance and Assurance Department, Wuhan P4 Lab: “The core technology of P4 laboratory is to control the release of contaminants, as well as to protect the lives of researchers. The biosafety performance provided by our laboratory facilities and equipment has reached the world’s first-class standard.”
Yuan Zhiming, Director, Wuhan P4 Lab: “The P4 laboratory is the highest biosafety level laboratory in the world, and also the safest laboratory. The completion of the laboratory signifies that our national researchers can carry out some research work on virulent viruses in our own laboratories.”
Shi Zhengli, Vice Director, Wuhan P4 Lab, Director of Center for Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases: “The P4 laboratory platform provides us with a better protective platform, so that this protective platform can ensure a safe working environment for our researchers engaged in pathogenic research.”
Chen Xinwen, Director, Wuhan Institute of Virology: “We rely on the Wuhan P4 laboratory, the integration of the strengths inside and outside the institution, through institutional innovation, in accordance with the requirements of the national laboratory construction, to construct the Biosafety Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences for large scale scientific research. We hope to become the main force and scientific research highland in the field of infectious disease and biosafety protection in China.”
Conquering‧Here, what we are exposed to are the most virulent viruses.
At present, there are only a dozen level four biosafety laboratories in the world that are actually in operation.
Wuhan P4 Laboratory not only meets the needs of cutting-edge basic research and major science and technology output, but also is an important strategic deployment of our country in public health and public safety. Its completion is also in response to the need of our time.
Chen Xinwen, Director, Wuhan Institute of Virology: “Facing the strategic needs of our country in the field of infectious disease protection, we have taken the initiative to adjust the research direction and achieved significant research results in the field of SARS traceability. Currently, we are focusing our research efforts on biosafety research.”
Over the years, a group of scientists after a group of scientists have been fighting with the virus for speed and patience. They have successfully conquered one virus after another with their strong belief and perseverance.
Shi Zhengli’s research team has been collecting more than 15,000 bat samples in China and Africa for ten years to track the source of SARS virus, and has isolated many new viruses.
Shi Zhengli, Vice Director, Wuhan P4 Lab, Director of Center for Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases: “After more than a decade of research, we have proven that the SARS virus originated from bats. In addition, we have also found that bats carry a variety of other viruses, such as adenovirus, filovirus, and other types of coronaviruses. Our findings provide an important basis for the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases in the future.”
The Xinjiang hemorrhagic fever virus is the only virulent source of natural epidemic infection found in China. Over the years, Hu Zhihong’s research team has collected more than 50,000 tick samples in Xinjiang and other regions. Through inoculation of suckling mice, they isolated three new strains of Xinjiang hemorrhagic fever virus from samples of hyalomma asiaticum.
Yuan Zhiming, Director, Wuhan P4 Lab: “The history of human development is a history of human struggle with infectious diseases, and now new and re-emerging infectious diseases continue to emerge, with unprecedented impact on global and regional economic and social development, as well as global public health security. We in science are dealing with viruses every day in order to study these viruses and to find techniques and methods to control their prevalence and outbreaks.”
Aggregation‧ Here, we are most powerful because we put our strength together
As the first biosafety level 4 laboratory in China, it plays an irreplaceable role as the core technology platform in our biosafety prevention system, and is an essential and great scientific installation for the research of virulent viruses. The safety of equipment and facilities has become the top priority of the laboratory construction.
Tong Xiao, Head of Equipment Maintenance and Assurance Department, Wuhan P4 Lab: “P4 laboratory research activities are mainly conducted inside the structure of two layers of enclosure structures. The enclosure structure and the external walls of the building together form a box within a box.
“Inside such a protection system, in order to protect the containment structure and biosafety, the first, third and fourth floors are equipped with corresponding biosafety equipment.
“The first floor is mainly equipped with power supply system, life support system, and sewage treatment system, while the 3rd and 4th floors where we are located are mainly equipped with ventilation control system, and our air filtration system.
“The technical design and key equipment of our P4 laboratories are integrated with international advanced technology.”
Song Donglin, Vice Director, Wuhan P4 Lab of Chinese Academy of Sciences: “This is our central control room. The staff in the central control room always maintain timely communication with the laboratory staff to provide the necessary technical support for their experiments, and when accidents happen, to ensure the normal operation and safety of the laboratory.”
Tong Xiao, Head of Equipment Maintenance and Assurance Department, Wuhan P4 Lab: “Our country’s P4 laboratory construction started late, but the standard is higher. The enclosure structure of our laboratory is independently developed by our team. It is a lightweight enclosure structure supported by lightweight steel keel. The use of full laser welding assembly technology solved the issues of installation of equipment and sealing technology. Its biosafety protection performance is among the top of the P4 laboratories in operation worldwide.”
The construction of Wuhan P4 laboratory is not only the construction of hardware, sound and perfect laws, regulations and guidance standards. The training of qualified personnel and the construction of a complete biosafety system is equally important.
Only perfect hardware, software and high-level biosafety management team can ensure the safe and efficient operation of the laboratory.
Song Donglin, Vice Director, Wuhan P4 Lab of Chinese Academy of Sciences: “When we first accepted the construction task in 2004, our country had no experience in the design and construction of P4 laboratories, lacked experience in the use and management of autoclave sterilizers and life support systems for personnel protection, and the national technical regulations were in the process of improvement.
“The Sino-French cooperation experienced a fierce clash of different ideas and cultural backgrounds, and we worked hard for more than ten years to complete the construction of the laboratory together.
“From 2 to 3 people at the beginning of the construction, we have gradually expanded and trained a team of about 30 people to manage the life safety of the laboratory and operate and maintain the equipment to ensure the safe operation of the laboratory.”
The P4 team, on the basis of summarizing more than one year of trial operation work, compiled about 500,000 words, including biosafety management manuals, procedure documents, operation instructions, SOP record sheets, and risk assessment reports in the complete management system documents.
Yuan Zhiming, Director, Wuhan P4 Lab: “The laboratory not only should have reliable physical facilities and strict management system, but more importantly, a professional management, operation and research team should be established through various training and exercises to ensure the safe operation and effective utilization of the laboratory. Through the cooperation among various teams and in practice, we will continue to find and establish suitable operation and management methods and mechanisms for this laboratory, so as to build the laboratory into an aircraft carrier with comprehensive combat capability in the field of infectious diseases and bio-safety.”
Adherence. Here, we want to make the flower of life never fade
Ten years to sharpen a sword, it is this perseverance and unyielding that forged the construction of Wuhan P4 laboratory. At present, the laboratory has obtained the China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment (CNAS) accreditation, and the pathogenic research accreditation from the National Health Planning Commission, becoming the first P4 laboratory in China to meet international standards for operation.
General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that the construction of P4 laboratory is of great importance to China’s public health, and the construction of P4 laboratory is a great symbol of Sino-French cooperation in health affairs.
Vice Premier Liu Yandong pointed out that it is an important part of the national security system and will certainly contribute to the protection of people’s health and world peace.
In the future, the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences will build a world-class large-scale science and technology sharing platform integrating higher-level biosafety laboratories, biological resources and big data center, integrate and develop biosafety technologies and equipment, create cross-science innovation platform, provide irreplaceable conditions and system services for biosafety research in China. It will take the lead in establishing a leading international biosafety research center and national laboratory, and make new significant contributions to promote sustainable socio-economic development.
Why Did Shi Zhengli and Peter Daszak Deny that There Were Bats at the Wuhan P4 Lab?
Now, what do you think after watching the whole thing? Feel free to type in your thoughts.
My takeaways are the following:
First of all, it does prove that they kept live bats in the lab. Let’s see a few screenshots again in case you didn’t catch them.
Let’s show Picture 2. This one is really a little bit terrifying, right? With a bat on this researcher’s face. And here the video says that Shi Zhengli’s team has been collecting more than 15,000 bat samples, and has isolated many new types of viruses.
Now let’s show Picture 3. This one shows somebody feeding the bat with a worm. Not sure whether this person is Shi Zhengli herself. Anyway, when this frame was on, Shi Zhengli was saying that they had found many types of coronavirus in bats. We all know that the CCP virus, or COVID19 is also a type of coronavirus, rights?
Now let’s show picture 4 and 5. These two photos show that live bats were kept in the lab when they filmed the video.
Then we must ask: Why did Shi Zhengli and World Health Organisation investigator Peter Daszak deny that there were bats in the Wuhan lab? What did they want to hide?
The World Should Demand All the Documents and Records from the Lab
The second takeaway is, since this video claims that they have a very strict and flawless management system installed in the lab, including biosafety management manuals, procedure documents, operation instructions, SOP, standard operating procedure, record sheets, and risk assessment reports, etc, the world, or the next serious investigation team should demand the Wuhan lab to show all of these documents, especially the SOP record sheets.
They should also have kept a work log. We need to know who was in the lab, what kinds of research was done, what kind of procedures, or precautions were taken to prevent the viruses from leaking from the lab, who was checking the safety issues, etc.
The World Should Exam The Accreditation Process of the Wuhan Lab
The third takeaway is, this video says that the Wuhan lab has obtained accreditation from both China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment and the National Health Planning Commission. I think we need to know what kind of documents were provided, what kind of procedures were taken for the Wuhan P4 lab to be granted accreditation? Who gave it the accreditations? And under what kind of standard?
“Intensive Clashes” Between the French and Chinese Side Over Chemical Weapon and Military Background Concern
The fourth takeaway is, the video mentions that there have been intense “clashes” between the Chinese and French side in terms of how to build the lab, and the Chinese team didn’t know how to build it, nor did they have any experience on how to do it, and it took them more than 10 years to build the lab, etc.
Maybe you want to say, are you kidding me? You are building the highest level biosafety lab to study, or maybe create the most dangerous viruses, yet you don’t know how to build it? You “independently” figured out how to do it?
Actually early last year, there have been a lot of reports about the problems with the construction of the lab.
According to a report of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the idea of building a P4 lab first came into being in 2003, right after the SARS outbreak.
Yuan Zhiming, the guy we just saw in the video, was entrusted with this task. By the way, at that time Yuan was a visiting scholar at the University of Illinois in the US.
Yuan went to France to seek technology as China didn’t have it, and reached an initial agreement in April 2003 with Claudie Haigneré, the French Minister of Research and New Technologies.
In July 2003, the Chinese Academy of Sciences signed an agreement with Wuhan City to build a P4 lab together.
In Oct 2004, during the visit of then French President Chirac to Beijing, France and China formally signed an agreement of cooperation.
So that’s the report of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
However, in France, the idea encountered a lot of opposition. Some French experts feared that the Chinese would use the technology provided by France to develop chemical weapons.
Another major problem was, also initially it was decided that the construction of the lab should be done by a French contractor RTV.
However, Chinese authorities switched the work to a local Wuhan company called IPPR.
According to the information of French intelligence, IPPR had close ties to subsidies of the Chinese military, some of which were already targets of concern by the American CIA.
That’s why French intelligence advised strongly against the cooperation.
Because of all these “intensive clashes”, the construction was delayed again and again, and only in 2017, more than 10 years after China and French signed the agreement, did the P4 lab finally start operation.
There was also another major problem, the Chinese side has repeatedly broken its promises over the course of more than a decade of cooperation. For example, the Chinese side initially promised to build just one laboratory in Wuhan, but later it turned out that they had built multiple labs, and some of them were very suspicious.
On Jan 28 last year, Radio Free Asia reported that Li Yuan, a former project executive of the Chinese Red Cross said that the Chinese side had added things to the lab that the French side was not aware of. He seriously doubted the quality of the lab, especially whether the designed negative pressure, the “black hole” that was supposed to hold the virus from escaping, was working properly. If not, the virus could escape.
Chinese language media New Tang Dynasty TV also reported on Feb 2 last year that the construction drawings of the P4 lab provided by France were modified by the Chinese side during the construction process without consulting the French said, and this violated the agreement with France.
Also, multiple P4 labs were secretly replicated. The critical virus recovery function could be lost as a result, increasing the risk of leakage.
Why Was Wuhan P4 Lab Taken Over by China’s Chief Biochemical Weapon Expert Chen Wei?
Now, let’s talk about another very suspicious matter. On Jan 26, 2020, 3 days after Wuhan was locked down because of pandemic, Chen Wei, a PLA general, China’s chief biochemical weapon expert, and director of the Institute of Biological Engineering at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, was sent to Wuhan to take over the full control of the Wuhan P4 lab.
Screenshot of a Chinese language report. On Jan 26, 2020, 3 days after Wuhan was locked down because of pandemic, Chen Wei, a PLA general, China’s chief biochemical weapon expert, and director of the Institute of Biological Engineering at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, was sent to Wuhan to take over the full control of the Wuhan P4 lab.
The CCP’s media say this is to give the people in Wuhan peace of mind and make them feel safer.
We have to ask, if the Wuhan lab is really the best with everything perfectly designed, everything under control, why should China’s chief biochemical weapon expert be sent there to take over it? Why didn’t the CCP ask Shi Zhengli to take the lead of the disease control effort instead, as Shi Zhengli was already in Wuhan, while Chen Wei was in Beijing, more than 700 miles away?
A reasonable guess is, the CCP knew something had gone terribly wrong in the Wuhan lab, and Chen Wei was sent over to clean up the mess, to destroy the evidence and to cover up everything. The CCP didn’t trust the Wuhan lab anymore.
Another possibility is, the military had been working together with the Wuhan lab in the first place. Remember we just said that despite the opposition of the French side, the CCP asked a Chinese company that has a military background and connections to build the lab?
So, if the military and the Wuhan lab were working together, you needed of course to rescue your partner when it was in trouble.
When Did Chen Wei Get the First Shot of Chinese Vaccine?
Another very suspicious thing is: When exactly did Chen Wei get her first shot of Chinese vaccine?
According to Chinese media, Chen Wei said that early morning, at 4:00 am on Feb 29, 2020, the first batch of vaccine arrived in Wuhan, she and other 6 CCP members received the vaccine that was developed by “ourselves” in front of a CCP flag.
Screenshot of a report by Chinese media. The Chinese characters say Chen Wei said that early morning, at 4:00 am on Feb 29, 2020, the first batch of vaccine arrived in Wuhan, she and other 6 CCP members received the vaccine that was developed by “ourselves” in front of a CCP flag.
Let’s see two photos. This one shows Chen Wei receiving an injection in front of the CCP flag.
Chen Wei receiving an injection in front of the CCP flag.
This one shows Chen Wei and the other 6 CCP members standing in front of the CCP flag before or after they received the vaccine.
Chen Wei and the other 6 CCP members standing in front of the CCP flag before or after they received the vaccine.
These two photos were circulated widely last year. But later when people questioned how a vaccine could be developed so fast, as Feb 29 was only about one month after Wuhan was locked down, some Chinese media, as well as the government website of Huangshi City in Hubei Province said the news about Chen Wei receiving vaccine was fake. The photo of Chen Wei getting a shot was taken before she went to Wuhan, she was not getting a vaccine shot, but only getting some drug to boost her immunity.
This report says news about Chen Wei receiving the vaccine is fake news.
A report from the official website of Huangshi City in Hubei Province also says the photo is not about Chen Wei receiving the vaccine. What she received was immunity boosting drug.
However, an official report on March 4 this year still says that Chen Wei and 6 other CCP members got the first shot of Chinese vaccine on Feb 29, 2020. The title of the report you are seeing is, “Chen Wei: The most Glorious Moment Was When the First Vaccine Dose Was Injected into My Body.”
An official report on March 4 this year still says that Chen Wei and 6 other CCP members got the first shot of Chinese vaccine on Feb 29, 2020. The title of the report is, “Chen Wei: The most Glorious Moment Was When the First Vaccine Dose Was Injected into My Body.”
So, we have to ask: When exactly did Chen Wei get the first shot? If it was really on Feb 29, 2020, why did they say the photos were fake last year? Is it really possible for a vaccine to be developed in only one month? If not, when did they start to develop it? When did they have the data of the virus to develop the vaccine?
Well, I think there are still too many questions to ask surrounding this Wuhan lab, the virus and the pandemic. But I am afraid that I have been talking for too long today. So I’ll stop for now.
Before you go, please don’t forget to subscribe to my channel, and share this video as widely as you can.
Thank you very much for watching. See you next Monday!
6/17/2021*
Donate to me directly 直接捐款：https://donorbox.org/inconvenient-truths-by-jennifer-zeng
Subscribestar 會員頻道： https://bit.ly/3fEzeJB
YouTube 油管：bit.ly/3b87DPj
GoFundme 衆籌：https://bit.ly/2zx6LVw
Patreon 網站：https://bit.ly/3cvBy3H
Paypal 捐款：http://paypal.me/JenniferZeng97
Bitcoin 捐款：bc1qlkkvwyvw96x3xx6jgzkhlnnv0nv3d9vm078vfd
Bombshell Evidence: Live Bats in Wuhan Lab & “Intense Clashes” Between China & France
Hello, everyone, welcome to “Inconvenient Truths”. I am your host Jennifer Zeng.
Today I will first of all show you a bombshell video, which shows that the P4 lab in Wuhan did keep live bats in it. Sky News showed a little bit of it several days ago. I found the entire, 11 minute video and translated it into English. So this is the exclusive world premiere of it.
After we watch the video, I will talk about my takeaways from it, and what we should do based on what this video tells us. I hope you can also share your thoughts about this video in the live chat area, or leave us some comments if you are watching after the live stream.
“The Story of the Construction and Research Team of The P4 Laboratory of Wuhan Institute of Virology”
Before we play the video, let me give you a little bit of background. It was created and released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences as a propaganda, or promotional video back in 2017 to mark the launch of the new Wuhan level 4 laboratory. Wuhan Institute of Virology belongs to the Chinese Academy of Sciences. I downloaded the video from the official website of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. I will put the link to this website in the comment area later. I have also archived this page, and will put the link to the archived page at the top of the comment area, in case the original page gets deleted after I release this translated video today.
Also, apart from adding English subtitles to the video, I haven’t changed anything in it. So what you’ll watch is the original, full version of it. I believe it is important to release the original version and keep it as is so that everybody can make up his or her own mind about it, so that it can be used as evidence, because it is original.
Now, without further ado, let’s watch the video together. Please make sure you read the English subtitles, as the video is in Chinese.
Transcript of the video:
Why Did Shi Zhengli and Peter Daszak Deny that There Were Bats at the Wuhan P4 Lab?
Now, what do you think after watching the whole thing? Feel free to type in your thoughts.
My takeaways are the following:
First of all, it does prove that they kept live bats in the lab. Let’s see a few screenshots again in case you didn’t catch them.
Let’s show Picture 2. This one is really a little bit terrifying, right? With a bat on this researcher’s face. And here the video says that Shi Zhengli’s team has been collecting more than 15,000 bat samples, and has isolated many new types of viruses.
Now let’s show Picture 3. This one shows somebody feeding the bat with a worm. Not sure whether this person is Shi Zhengli herself. Anyway, when this frame was on, Shi Zhengli was saying that they had found many types of coronavirus in bats. We all know that the CCP virus, or COVID19 is also a type of coronavirus, rights?
Now let’s show picture 4 and 5. These two photos show that live bats were kept in the lab when they filmed the video.
Then we must ask: Why did Shi Zhengli and World Health Organisation investigator Peter Daszak deny that there were bats in the Wuhan lab? What did they want to hide?
The World Should Demand All the Documents and Records from the Lab
The second takeaway is, since this video claims that they have a very strict and flawless management system installed in the lab, including biosafety management manuals, procedure documents, operation instructions, SOP, standard operating procedure, record sheets, and risk assessment reports, etc, the world, or the next serious investigation team should demand the Wuhan lab to show all of these documents, especially the SOP record sheets.
They should also have kept a work log. We need to know who was in the lab, what kinds of research was done, what kind of procedures, or precautions were taken to prevent the viruses from leaking from the lab, who was checking the safety issues, etc.
The World Should Exam The Accreditation Process of the Wuhan Lab
The third takeaway is, this video says that the Wuhan lab has obtained accreditation from both China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment and the National Health Planning Commission. I think we need to know what kind of documents were provided, what kind of procedures were taken for the Wuhan P4 lab to be granted accreditation? Who gave it the accreditations? And under what kind of standard?
“Intensive Clashes” Between the French and Chinese Side Over Chemical Weapon and Military Background Concern
The fourth takeaway is, the video mentions that there have been intense “clashes” between the Chinese and French side in terms of how to build the lab, and the Chinese team didn’t know how to build it, nor did they have any experience on how to do it, and it took them more than 10 years to build the lab, etc.
Maybe you want to say, are you kidding me? You are building the highest level biosafety lab to study, or maybe create the most dangerous viruses, yet you don’t know how to build it? You “independently” figured out how to do it?
Actually early last year, there have been a lot of reports about the problems with the construction of the lab.
According to a report of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the idea of building a P4 lab first came into being in 2003, right after the SARS outbreak.
Yuan Zhiming, the guy we just saw in the video, was entrusted with this task. By the way, at that time Yuan was a visiting scholar at the University of Illinois in the US.
Yuan went to France to seek technology as China didn’t have it, and reached an initial agreement in April 2003 with Claudie Haigneré, the French Minister of Research and New Technologies.
In July 2003, the Chinese Academy of Sciences signed an agreement with Wuhan City to build a P4 lab together.
In Oct 2004, during the visit of then French President Chirac to Beijing, France and China formally signed an agreement of cooperation.
So that’s the report of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
However, in France, the idea encountered a lot of opposition. Some French experts feared that the Chinese would use the technology provided by France to develop chemical weapons.
Another major problem was, also initially it was decided that the construction of the lab should be done by a French contractor RTV.
However, Chinese authorities switched the work to a local Wuhan company called IPPR.
According to the information of French intelligence, IPPR had close ties to subsidies of the Chinese military, some of which were already targets of concern by the American CIA.
That’s why French intelligence advised strongly against the cooperation.
Because of all these “intensive clashes”, the construction was delayed again and again, and only in 2017, more than 10 years after China and French signed the agreement, did the P4 lab finally start operation.
There was also another major problem, the Chinese side has repeatedly broken its promises over the course of more than a decade of cooperation. For example, the Chinese side initially promised to build just one laboratory in Wuhan, but later it turned out that they had built multiple labs, and some of them were very suspicious.
On Jan 28 last year, Radio Free Asia reported that Li Yuan, a former project executive of the Chinese Red Cross said that the Chinese side had added things to the lab that the French side was not aware of. He seriously doubted the quality of the lab, especially whether the designed negative pressure, the “black hole” that was supposed to hold the virus from escaping, was working properly. If not, the virus could escape.
Chinese language media New Tang Dynasty TV also reported on Feb 2 last year that the construction drawings of the P4 lab provided by France were modified by the Chinese side during the construction process without consulting the French said, and this violated the agreement with France.
Also, multiple P4 labs were secretly replicated. The critical virus recovery function could be lost as a result, increasing the risk of leakage.
Why Was Wuhan P4 Lab Taken Over by China’s Chief Biochemical Weapon Expert Chen Wei?
Now, let’s talk about another very suspicious matter. On Jan 26, 2020, 3 days after Wuhan was locked down because of pandemic, Chen Wei, a PLA general, China’s chief biochemical weapon expert, and director of the Institute of Biological Engineering at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, was sent to Wuhan to take over the full control of the Wuhan P4 lab.
Screenshot of a Chinese language report. On Jan 26, 2020, 3 days after Wuhan was locked down because of pandemic, Chen Wei, a PLA general, China’s chief biochemical weapon expert, and director of the Institute of Biological Engineering at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, was sent to Wuhan to take over the full control of the Wuhan P4 lab.
The CCP’s media say this is to give the people in Wuhan peace of mind and make them feel safer.
We have to ask, if the Wuhan lab is really the best with everything perfectly designed, everything under control, why should China’s chief biochemical weapon expert be sent there to take over it? Why didn’t the CCP ask Shi Zhengli to take the lead of the disease control effort instead, as Shi Zhengli was already in Wuhan, while Chen Wei was in Beijing, more than 700 miles away?
A reasonable guess is, the CCP knew something had gone terribly wrong in the Wuhan lab, and Chen Wei was sent over to clean up the mess, to destroy the evidence and to cover up everything. The CCP didn’t trust the Wuhan lab anymore.
Another possibility is, the military had been working together with the Wuhan lab in the first place. Remember we just said that despite the opposition of the French side, the CCP asked a Chinese company that has a military background and connections to build the lab?
So, if the military and the Wuhan lab were working together, you needed of course to rescue your partner when it was in trouble.
When Did Chen Wei Get the First Shot of Chinese Vaccine?
Another very suspicious thing is: When exactly did Chen Wei get her first shot of Chinese vaccine?
According to Chinese media, Chen Wei said that early morning, at 4:00 am on Feb 29, 2020, the first batch of vaccine arrived in Wuhan, she and other 6 CCP members received the vaccine that was developed by “ourselves” in front of a CCP flag.
Screenshot of a report by Chinese media. The Chinese characters say Chen Wei said that early morning, at 4:00 am on Feb 29, 2020, the first batch of vaccine arrived in Wuhan, she and other 6 CCP members received the vaccine that was developed by “ourselves” in front of a CCP flag.
Let’s see two photos. This one shows Chen Wei receiving an injection in front of the CCP flag.
Chen Wei receiving an injection in front of the CCP flag.
This one shows Chen Wei and the other 6 CCP members standing in front of the CCP flag before or after they received the vaccine.
Chen Wei and the other 6 CCP members standing in front of the CCP flag before or after they received the vaccine.
These two photos were circulated widely last year. But later when people questioned how a vaccine could be developed so fast, as Feb 29 was only about one month after Wuhan was locked down, some Chinese media, as well as the government website of Huangshi City in Hubei Province said the news about Chen Wei receiving vaccine was fake. The photo of Chen Wei getting a shot was taken before she went to Wuhan, she was not getting a vaccine shot, but only getting some drug to boost her immunity.
This report says news about Chen Wei receiving the vaccine is fake news.
A report from the official website of Huangshi City in Hubei Province also says the photo is not about Chen Wei receiving the vaccine. What she received was immunity boosting drug.
However, an official report on March 4 this year still says that Chen Wei and 6 other CCP members got the first shot of Chinese vaccine on Feb 29, 2020. The title of the report you are seeing is, “Chen Wei: The most Glorious Moment Was When the First Vaccine Dose Was Injected into My Body.”
An official report on March 4 this year still says that Chen Wei and 6 other CCP members got the first shot of Chinese vaccine on Feb 29, 2020. The title of the report is, “Chen Wei: The most Glorious Moment Was When the First Vaccine Dose Was Injected into My Body.”
So, we have to ask: When exactly did Chen Wei get the first shot? If it was really on Feb 29, 2020, why did they say the photos were fake last year? Is it really possible for a vaccine to be developed in only one month? If not, when did they start to develop it? When did they have the data of the virus to develop the vaccine?
Well, I think there are still too many questions to ask surrounding this Wuhan lab, the virus and the pandemic. But I am afraid that I have been talking for too long today. So I’ll stop for now.
Before you go, please don’t forget to subscribe to my channel, and share this video as widely as you can.
Thank you very much for watching. See you next Monday!
6/17/2021*
Donate to me directly 直接捐款：https://donorbox.org/inconvenient-truths-by-jennifer-zeng
Subscribestar 會員頻道： https://bit.ly/3fEzeJB
YouTube 油管：bit.ly/3b87DPj
GoFundme 衆籌：https://bit.ly/2zx6LVw
Patreon 網站：https://bit.ly/3cvBy3H
Paypal 捐款：http://paypal.me/JenniferZeng97
Bitcoin 捐款：bc1qlkkvwyvw96x3xx6jgzkhlnnv0nv3d9vm078vfd