Hello, everyone, nice to see you.
Today I’ll talk about a very interesting topic: The missing piece of the puzzle of the origin of COVID-19, or the CCP virus. I will present a unique view, or perceptive, about not only the origin of the CCP virus but also how the virus spread from bat to human. So stay tuned.
The unique view that I am going to present is not actually the view of myself, but of two authors of a series of articles published at Minghui website in the Chinese language, authored by Tong Geng and Wu Xuan.
Minghui website is the official website of Falun Gong. Falun Gong, by the way, is an ancient Chinese spiritual discipline in the Buddhist tradition. It consists of moral teachings, meditation, and four gentle exercises to improve health and energy levels. Its core values are Truthfulness, Compassion, and Tolerance.
In the past 21 years, it has been ruthlessly persecuted by the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP.
Usually, Falun Gong’s website only publishes articles related to the persecution and the practice of Falun Gong itself. It’s very rare that an article unrelated to the practice or the persecution appears on Minghui’s website. That’s why this series of articles drew my attention.
Also, the arguments and the final conclusion the authors made are very unique too. That’s why I think it’s necessary to present them here, as understanding the origin of the CCP virus and its path of spreading is so vital for us if we want to find a cure. That’s why we cannot ignore any reasonable arguments or theories.
Before the authors put out their final conclusion or hypothesis or theory, they discussed first the several stages or different theories which people, especially people in China, managed to come up with when everyone wanted to figure out how this fatal pandemic started. I’ll only talk about a few here.
Theory 1: Wet Market
The claim that the virus came from the South China Seafood Market was the first theory put out there by the CCP. This claim was soon deemed as invalid as many initial patients had not been to the market at all.
Theory 2: Bioweapon Produced by the US to target Chinese people
When we mention “conspiracy theory” now, many people might think that it refers to the theory that the virus is a bioweapon created by the CCP.
Actually, the first “conspiracy theory” emerging after the outbreak is one that claims the virus is a bioweapon produced by the US to target Chinese people.
China’s military website Xilu published a very long article on Jan. 26, with the title “4 Key Proteins of COVID19 Have Been Replaced, Which Can Precisely Attack Chinese” (https://www.jenniferzengblog.com/home/4-key-proteins-of-covid19-have-been-replaced-which-can-precisely-attack-chinese). The main arguments of this article are that the US has been collecting blood and DNA samples of Chinese people to develop bioweapons that can especially target Chinese. It mentions that 4 key proteins in the CCP virus were replaced so that the virus can have a “strong ability to infect humans”, etc.
Of course, everyone would laugh at the theory now, as so many, or much more non-Chinese were infected and killed by the CCP virus. But that was the theory once put out there by a Chinese military website, although that article was taken down later.
Theory 3: Leaked from the lab
On Feb 2, a scholar called himself or herself Dr. Wu Xiaohua published a WeChat post, saying that the management of some labs in China is very poor, animals that have been used in experiments are not dealt with properly. Sometimes they are discarded carelessly, sometimes they are sold as wild animals, sometimes they are taken back home and kept as pets, sometimes they are even eaten by researchers and students.
Theory 4: Leaked from the P3 lab of Wuhan CDC
On Feb. 16, a paper published at ResearchGate by two Chinese scientists claims that the virus was probably leaked from the lab of Wuhan CDC, which is only 280 meters away from the wet market. But that paper was soon taken down.
Theory 5: Virus Comes from Bat, Not Man-made
On January 23, the day when Wuhan was suddenly locked down, Shi Zhengli, a virologist at Wuhan Institute of Virology, who is very well-known now, published a preprint paper at New England Journal of Medicine. The paper says that this new coronavirus shows 96.2% of whole-genome identity to a virus called BatCoV RaTG13, which was detected in horseshoe bats in Yunan Province in China, and kept by Shi Zhengli’s team.
Since then it is commonly accepted that the bats in the caves in Yunan are the common reservoirs for both SARS and COVID-19.
Theory 6: Pangolins Are the Intermediate Host
After locking bats as the source of the CCP virus, looking for an intermediate host became a major task for scientists in China. They tested 4000 samples from all sorts of livestock and seafood, without finding out anything.
Then, on Feb. 7, South China Agricultural University in Guangzhou suddenly announced that it had found a coronavirus in pangolins that is 99% identical with the CCP virus, so pangolins are the intermediate hosts!
The University held a press conference on the same day to announce this most “important” discovery, with CCP’s official media outlets all celebrating that “we’ve finally found it!”
However, the celebration didn’t last long, as people soon found that there were too many deadly loopholes with this “finding”, including:
The sample they tested did NOT come from Wuhan, but from “certain specific organizations”, and the quantity was “very small”.
The tested samples were from sick pangolins. Usually, hosts of viruses won’t get sick themselves, that’s the reason why they can spread the viruses widely.
The university had not had the research paper ready yet but held a “premature” press conference to announce their “findings” first.
Chinese pangolins have almost died out, and the pangolins Chinese people are consuming now are mostly smuggled into China from Southeast Asian countries. How could the virus in a bat cave in Yunan Province travel all the way to Southeast Asian countries?
Also, most bats in China don’t migrate at all. Instead, they hibernate in their caves in winter.
Because of these deadly loopholes, this theory soon died out.
Theory 7: Man-Made Killer
Experts who proposed a man-made theory mainly based their hypothesis on two pieces of evidence:
The external S-protein of the CCP virus has a specific amino acid insertion, and this looks like traces left behind by recombination techniques.
The CCP virus appears to have a gene sequence that closely resembles an artificial shuttle vector (p Shuttle SN Vector), a sequence that should not exist in nature.
By the way, the scientist who made this claim is Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, a Senior Research Scientist at the University of Pittsburgh. I personally interviewed him in early February, after he published his article “On the Origins of the 2019-nCoV Virus, Wuhan, China”.
After talking to him for hours, I wrote up a report based on his interview. Several days later, he changed his position after further study and asked me to unpublish my report about his interview, which I did.
Now go back to the Minghui article we’ve been talking about. The authors argue that the above two pieces of evidence both base on a precondition, that is, man understands enough of all the genes of natural species. Otherwise, man cannot claim that what they have found in the coronavirus does NOT exist in nature.
That is to say, because we don’t know all about what DOES exist in nature, we cannot claim that what we found in the coronavirus is unnatural, or man-made.
The authors go on to say that the insertion of the external S-protein does exist in nature, with a new coronavirus found in Yunnan, named RmYN02.
Well, the above are some of the theories the authors examed. Then they go on to say that common sense tells us that wherever the epidemic starts, wherever the origin of the virus is. By examining and then discarding all the false claims, the core issues emerge naturally, that is, the possibility that the virus escaped from the P4 lab in Wuhan.
Then the authors present a very important fact that I haven’t seen elsewhere: no matter how good the internal design of the P4 lab could be, there is a huge loophole with the design of another part of the lab, and that loophole is: There is no incinerator at or near the lab to burn the bodies of the animals that have been used in experiments.
The routine procedure is, after simple disinfection of the exterior and surface of the animals’ bodies, they are then sealed in a large plastic bag, and put into the refrigerator.
After a certain amount of bodies are accumulated this way, they will then be transported outside of the lab, to be centrally incinerated by a contractor.
The problem is, if the contractor doesn’t deal with the bodies properly, what will happen?
So, according to the authors, this is a huge loophole with the design of the P4 lab in Wuhan. It means the viruses have a “back door” to escape.
As we mentioned before, Dr. Wu Xiaohua already pointed out that animals’ bodies used in the experiments were not dealt with properly.
Likewise, another social media post on Feb. 17 by Chen Quanjiao, a researcher of Wuhan Institute of Virology, also claimed that Wang Yanyi, the director of Wuhan Institute of Virology, was responsible for the leak of the virus from the lab.
I have a personal friend who was once a doctor in China. He also told me that animals used in the labs of universities and research institutes indeed were treated very carelessly sometimes.
On January 2 this year, there was an interesting case in China. Li Ning, a professor at China Agricultural University was sentenced to 12 years for “embezzlement of scientific research funds”.
According to the judgment, Li Ning illegally gained about 11 million yuan, or 1.44 million US dollars, by selling animals and milk used in scientific experiments to the market.
The authors of the Minghui article say that Li Ning’s case is not an isolated one. It reflects a systemic problem with the management of labs in China. The contractors can profit a lot, if, on the one hand, they are paid for the disposal of the animals’ bodies, and on the other hand, they can make more money by selling the animals, instead of burning and destroying them.
Therefore, the authors ask: Would Wuhan Institute of Virology dare to disclose information of their contractors who are dealing with the disposal of the animals’ bodies? Who are they? Are there any proper contracts, management and supervision systems, and records of the contractors’ works? Can those be disclosed? If the Wuhan Institute of Virology dares not to disclose these, there must be problems.
And, the authors ultimately argue, even if they do have a perfect management system, and nothing went wrong with the animals’ bodies, there is still another loophole that nobody would have imagined, or could have been prevented whatsoever.
What is that loophole?
It is the possibility that Shi Zhengli and her team members could get infected by viruses in the bats during their studies.
In a speech made in June 2018, Shi Zhengli said, “Although bats carry many viruses, their chances of directly infecting people are actually very small. Only at what point do we increase our protection? Usually, it’s when there are too many bats in a cave, you go in there and there are a lot of dust droplets, and we don’t feel too good after we inhale them into our lungs, so we add some protection. Most of the time, we just take some simple protection measures, and it’s OK.”
If we check the photos’ of Shi Zhengli’s team working with the bats, we can see that they had little protection.
Sometimes they had gloves, sometimes they didn’t.
In an interview with CCVT in 2017, a researcher named Cui Jie (崔杰) said that the bats could bite them even when they did wear gloves, and it felt like being pierced by needles when bitten by a bat.
According to the CCTV report, Shi Zhengli’s team would also inject rabies vaccines in advance to protect themselves.
The authors of the Minghui article ask, “How many viruses have entered the researchers’ bodies after they were bitten by a bat that carried over a dozen different viruses? How would those viruses recombine and mutate themselves in the bodies of their new hosts? Nobody can predict.”
Therefore, the authors argue that Shi Zhengli’s team could have become the first generation intermediate host for the ancestor of the CCP virus. Nobody could have imagined or stopped it.
The authors say the viruses that infected Shi Zhengli’s team could be non-fatal ones. They didn’t cause people to become sick. However, after reproducing and mutating themselves, they could become killer viruses.
The authors say, one fact can serve as supporting evidence for this argument, that is, after the outbreak of the CCP virus in Wuhan, none of the researchers in Wuhan Institute of Virology has been infected. The reason is, they’ve already had anti-bodies.
The authors say, She Zhengli once outlined the transmission path of SARS: From the bats in the caves in Yunan province to the civets breed nearby. After those civets were sold to Guangdong province, the virus reproduced and mutated within the bodies of more civets and then jumped to human bodies. This path has been widely recognized.
The authors say, the same path also applies to the CCP virus, although there are two different possibilities:
Two different possibilities of the transmission of the CCP Virus.
The virus was collected from the caves in Yunan, brought back to the lab in Wuhan, and preserved there for further studies. The virus somehow escaped through the “backdoor” of the P4 lab, jumped to an unknown intermediate host, and then to human beings.
The virus from the caves in Yunan infected Shi Zhengli’s team, which became the first generation intermediate host. Then the first generation intermediate host infected another unknown intermediate host, which then infected human beings.
The authors say, whichever path of the above is the actual case, Wuhan Institue of Virology is responsible for the leak.
The authors then outline how the CCP virus pandemic has become a “perfect storm”.
First of all, the ability of the CCP virus to invade human cells is dozen times higher than that of SARS, the incubation period is longer, it attacks more human organ systems than SARS, and it can hide itself like HIV virus when the patients take powerful drugs. It chose a “perfect location” and “perfect timing” to break out, as Wuhan is the transportation hub that connects all the transportation systems in China, and the time of the break out was just before the Chinese New Year when hundreds of millions traveled to other places to spend the New Year’s holiday with their families.
On top of those, the most corrupt, most deceitful, most powerful, most ruthless and most totalitarian regime, the CCP regime, ensured the severest cover-ups of the outbreak, to enable the virus to spread as widely as it could.
Put all the above elements together, a “perfect” pandemic for humankind was thus created.
The authors say, many different prophecies had all successfully predicted the outbreak of SARS and CCP virus with much accuracy, including when they would break out. Many prophets also predicted that humankind would encounter three mass waves of pandemics, and the current one is only the second, and the third one could be more dreadful and deadly if human beings are not awakened by the second one.
The authors say at the end of their article, “Everyone is a victim of Satan’s lies. Every life is worth cherishing, and no matter what he has ever done to the Lord God and His messengers. Even if he has slandered the Buddha and tried to destroy the Buddha and to persecute Buddha’s disciples, God has not given up on him for salvation. Find the fundamental cure to the plague and spread the message of salvation. Only that is the ultimate way of self-salvation for mankind.”
OK, that’s all for today. Thanks for watching. Truth saves lives. Please subscribe to my channel and share it.
Thank you. See you next time!
5/6/2020
Links to the original Minghui articles:
1. https://bit.ly/2zgHq1U 2. https://bit.ly/2A0ALJy 3. https://bit.ly/3dl4QC0 4. https://bit.ly/2zcaEyZ 5. https://bit.ly/3dompkA 6. https://bit.ly/2L6pCZZ 7. https://bit.ly/3b9Qcw6
Donate to Support: 捐款信息
GoFundme: 衆籌網：https://www.gofundme.com/f/telling-the-truth-about-covid19-ccp-amp-china
Patreon 網站：https://www.patreon.com/InconvenientTruths
Paypal 捐款：http://paypal.me/JenniferZeng97
Chase Quickpay/Zelle 轉款: heavenlyriver9707@gmail.com
Transferwise 轉款：heavenlyriver9707@gmail.com
Tranferwise register 帳號免費註冊：https://transferwise.com/invite/u/e
Origin of the CCP Virus: The Missing Piece of the Puzzle
Hello, everyone, nice to see you.
Today I’ll talk about a very interesting topic: The missing piece of the puzzle of the origin of COVID-19, or the CCP virus. I will present a unique view, or perceptive, about not only the origin of the CCP virus but also how the virus spread from bat to human. So stay tuned.
The unique view that I am going to present is not actually the view of myself, but of two authors of a series of articles published at Minghui website in the Chinese language, authored by Tong Geng and Wu Xuan.
Minghui website is the official website of Falun Gong. Falun Gong, by the way, is an ancient Chinese spiritual discipline in the Buddhist tradition. It consists of moral teachings, meditation, and four gentle exercises to improve health and energy levels. Its core values are Truthfulness, Compassion, and Tolerance.
In the past 21 years, it has been ruthlessly persecuted by the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP.
Usually, Falun Gong’s website only publishes articles related to the persecution and the practice of Falun Gong itself. It’s very rare that an article unrelated to the practice or the persecution appears on Minghui’s website. That’s why this series of articles drew my attention.
Also, the arguments and the final conclusion the authors made are very unique too. That’s why I think it’s necessary to present them here, as understanding the origin of the CCP virus and its path of spreading is so vital for us if we want to find a cure. That’s why we cannot ignore any reasonable arguments or theories.
Before the authors put out their final conclusion or hypothesis or theory, they discussed first the several stages or different theories which people, especially people in China, managed to come up with when everyone wanted to figure out how this fatal pandemic started. I’ll only talk about a few here.
Theory 1: Wet Market
The claim that the virus came from the South China Seafood Market was the first theory put out there by the CCP. This claim was soon deemed as invalid as many initial patients had not been to the market at all.
Theory 2: Bioweapon Produced by the US to target Chinese people
When we mention “conspiracy theory” now, many people might think that it refers to the theory that the virus is a bioweapon created by the CCP.
Actually, the first “conspiracy theory” emerging after the outbreak is one that claims the virus is a bioweapon produced by the US to target Chinese people.
China’s military website Xilu published a very long article on Jan. 26, with the title “4 Key Proteins of COVID19 Have Been Replaced, Which Can Precisely Attack Chinese” (https://www.jenniferzengblog.com/home/4-key-proteins-of-covid19-have-been-replaced-which-can-precisely-attack-chinese). The main arguments of this article are that the US has been collecting blood and DNA samples of Chinese people to develop bioweapons that can especially target Chinese. It mentions that 4 key proteins in the CCP virus were replaced so that the virus can have a “strong ability to infect humans”, etc.
Of course, everyone would laugh at the theory now, as so many, or much more non-Chinese were infected and killed by the CCP virus. But that was the theory once put out there by a Chinese military website, although that article was taken down later.
Theory 3: Leaked from the lab
On Feb 2, a scholar called himself or herself Dr. Wu Xiaohua published a WeChat post, saying that the management of some labs in China is very poor, animals that have been used in experiments are not dealt with properly. Sometimes they are discarded carelessly, sometimes they are sold as wild animals, sometimes they are taken back home and kept as pets, sometimes they are even eaten by researchers and students.
Theory 4: Leaked from the P3 lab of Wuhan CDC
On Feb. 16, a paper published at ResearchGate by two Chinese scientists claims that the virus was probably leaked from the lab of Wuhan CDC, which is only 280 meters away from the wet market. But that paper was soon taken down.
Theory 5: Virus Comes from Bat, Not Man-made
On January 23, the day when Wuhan was suddenly locked down, Shi Zhengli, a virologist at Wuhan Institute of Virology, who is very well-known now, published a preprint paper at New England Journal of Medicine. The paper says that this new coronavirus shows 96.2% of whole-genome identity to a virus called BatCoV RaTG13, which was detected in horseshoe bats in Yunan Province in China, and kept by Shi Zhengli’s team.
Since then it is commonly accepted that the bats in the caves in Yunan are the common reservoirs for both SARS and COVID-19.
Theory 6: Pangolins Are the Intermediate Host
After locking bats as the source of the CCP virus, looking for an intermediate host became a major task for scientists in China. They tested 4000 samples from all sorts of livestock and seafood, without finding out anything.
Then, on Feb. 7, South China Agricultural University in Guangzhou suddenly announced that it had found a coronavirus in pangolins that is 99% identical with the CCP virus, so pangolins are the intermediate hosts!
The University held a press conference on the same day to announce this most “important” discovery, with CCP’s official media outlets all celebrating that “we’ve finally found it!”
However, the celebration didn’t last long, as people soon found that there were too many deadly loopholes with this “finding”, including:
The sample they tested did NOT come from Wuhan, but from “certain specific organizations”, and the quantity was “very small”.
The tested samples were from sick pangolins. Usually, hosts of viruses won’t get sick themselves, that’s the reason why they can spread the viruses widely.
The university had not had the research paper ready yet but held a “premature” press conference to announce their “findings” first.
Chinese pangolins have almost died out, and the pangolins Chinese people are consuming now are mostly smuggled into China from Southeast Asian countries. How could the virus in a bat cave in Yunan Province travel all the way to Southeast Asian countries?
Also, most bats in China don’t migrate at all. Instead, they hibernate in their caves in winter.
Because of these deadly loopholes, this theory soon died out.
Theory 7: Man-Made Killer
Experts who proposed a man-made theory mainly based their hypothesis on two pieces of evidence:
The external S-protein of the CCP virus has a specific amino acid insertion, and this looks like traces left behind by recombination techniques.
The CCP virus appears to have a gene sequence that closely resembles an artificial shuttle vector (p Shuttle SN Vector), a sequence that should not exist in nature.
By the way, the scientist who made this claim is Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, a Senior Research Scientist at the University of Pittsburgh. I personally interviewed him in early February, after he published his article “On the Origins of the 2019-nCoV Virus, Wuhan, China”.
After talking to him for hours, I wrote up a report based on his interview. Several days later, he changed his position after further study and asked me to unpublish my report about his interview, which I did.
Now go back to the Minghui article we’ve been talking about. The authors argue that the above two pieces of evidence both base on a precondition, that is, man understands enough of all the genes of natural species. Otherwise, man cannot claim that what they have found in the coronavirus does NOT exist in nature.
That is to say, because we don’t know all about what DOES exist in nature, we cannot claim that what we found in the coronavirus is unnatural, or man-made.
The authors go on to say that the insertion of the external S-protein does exist in nature, with a new coronavirus found in Yunnan, named RmYN02.
Well, the above are some of the theories the authors examed. Then they go on to say that common sense tells us that wherever the epidemic starts, wherever the origin of the virus is. By examining and then discarding all the false claims, the core issues emerge naturally, that is, the possibility that the virus escaped from the P4 lab in Wuhan.
Then the authors present a very important fact that I haven’t seen elsewhere: no matter how good the internal design of the P4 lab could be, there is a huge loophole with the design of another part of the lab, and that loophole is: There is no incinerator at or near the lab to burn the bodies of the animals that have been used in experiments.
The routine procedure is, after simple disinfection of the exterior and surface of the animals’ bodies, they are then sealed in a large plastic bag, and put into the refrigerator.
After a certain amount of bodies are accumulated this way, they will then be transported outside of the lab, to be centrally incinerated by a contractor.
The problem is, if the contractor doesn’t deal with the bodies properly, what will happen?
So, according to the authors, this is a huge loophole with the design of the P4 lab in Wuhan. It means the viruses have a “back door” to escape.
As we mentioned before, Dr. Wu Xiaohua already pointed out that animals’ bodies used in the experiments were not dealt with properly.
Likewise, another social media post on Feb. 17 by Chen Quanjiao, a researcher of Wuhan Institute of Virology, also claimed that Wang Yanyi, the director of Wuhan Institute of Virology, was responsible for the leak of the virus from the lab.
I have a personal friend who was once a doctor in China. He also told me that animals used in the labs of universities and research institutes indeed were treated very carelessly sometimes.
On January 2 this year, there was an interesting case in China. Li Ning, a professor at China Agricultural University was sentenced to 12 years for “embezzlement of scientific research funds”.
According to the judgment, Li Ning illegally gained about 11 million yuan, or 1.44 million US dollars, by selling animals and milk used in scientific experiments to the market.
The authors of the Minghui article say that Li Ning’s case is not an isolated one. It reflects a systemic problem with the management of labs in China. The contractors can profit a lot, if, on the one hand, they are paid for the disposal of the animals’ bodies, and on the other hand, they can make more money by selling the animals, instead of burning and destroying them.
Therefore, the authors ask: Would Wuhan Institute of Virology dare to disclose information of their contractors who are dealing with the disposal of the animals’ bodies? Who are they? Are there any proper contracts, management and supervision systems, and records of the contractors’ works? Can those be disclosed? If the Wuhan Institute of Virology dares not to disclose these, there must be problems.
And, the authors ultimately argue, even if they do have a perfect management system, and nothing went wrong with the animals’ bodies, there is still another loophole that nobody would have imagined, or could have been prevented whatsoever.
What is that loophole?
It is the possibility that Shi Zhengli and her team members could get infected by viruses in the bats during their studies.
In a speech made in June 2018, Shi Zhengli said, “Although bats carry many viruses, their chances of directly infecting people are actually very small. Only at what point do we increase our protection? Usually, it’s when there are too many bats in a cave, you go in there and there are a lot of dust droplets, and we don’t feel too good after we inhale them into our lungs, so we add some protection. Most of the time, we just take some simple protection measures, and it’s OK.”
If we check the photos’ of Shi Zhengli’s team working with the bats, we can see that they had little protection.
Sometimes they had gloves, sometimes they didn’t.
In an interview with CCVT in 2017, a researcher named Cui Jie (崔杰) said that the bats could bite them even when they did wear gloves, and it felt like being pierced by needles when bitten by a bat.
According to the CCTV report, Shi Zhengli’s team would also inject rabies vaccines in advance to protect themselves.
The authors of the Minghui article ask, “How many viruses have entered the researchers’ bodies after they were bitten by a bat that carried over a dozen different viruses? How would those viruses recombine and mutate themselves in the bodies of their new hosts? Nobody can predict.”
Therefore, the authors argue that Shi Zhengli’s team could have become the first generation intermediate host for the ancestor of the CCP virus. Nobody could have imagined or stopped it.
The authors say the viruses that infected Shi Zhengli’s team could be non-fatal ones. They didn’t cause people to become sick. However, after reproducing and mutating themselves, they could become killer viruses.
The authors say, one fact can serve as supporting evidence for this argument, that is, after the outbreak of the CCP virus in Wuhan, none of the researchers in Wuhan Institute of Virology has been infected. The reason is, they’ve already had anti-bodies.
The authors say, She Zhengli once outlined the transmission path of SARS: From the bats in the caves in Yunan province to the civets breed nearby. After those civets were sold to Guangdong province, the virus reproduced and mutated within the bodies of more civets and then jumped to human bodies. This path has been widely recognized.
The authors say, the same path also applies to the CCP virus, although there are two different possibilities:
Two different possibilities of the transmission of the CCP Virus.
The virus was collected from the caves in Yunan, brought back to the lab in Wuhan, and preserved there for further studies. The virus somehow escaped through the “backdoor” of the P4 lab, jumped to an unknown intermediate host, and then to human beings.
The virus from the caves in Yunan infected Shi Zhengli’s team, which became the first generation intermediate host. Then the first generation intermediate host infected another unknown intermediate host, which then infected human beings.
The authors say, whichever path of the above is the actual case, Wuhan Institue of Virology is responsible for the leak.
The authors then outline how the CCP virus pandemic has become a “perfect storm”.
First of all, the ability of the CCP virus to invade human cells is dozen times higher than that of SARS, the incubation period is longer, it attacks more human organ systems than SARS, and it can hide itself like HIV virus when the patients take powerful drugs. It chose a “perfect location” and “perfect timing” to break out, as Wuhan is the transportation hub that connects all the transportation systems in China, and the time of the break out was just before the Chinese New Year when hundreds of millions traveled to other places to spend the New Year’s holiday with their families.
On top of those, the most corrupt, most deceitful, most powerful, most ruthless and most totalitarian regime, the CCP regime, ensured the severest cover-ups of the outbreak, to enable the virus to spread as widely as it could.
Put all the above elements together, a “perfect” pandemic for humankind was thus created.
The authors say, many different prophecies had all successfully predicted the outbreak of SARS and CCP virus with much accuracy, including when they would break out. Many prophets also predicted that humankind would encounter three mass waves of pandemics, and the current one is only the second, and the third one could be more dreadful and deadly if human beings are not awakened by the second one.
The authors say at the end of their article, “Everyone is a victim of Satan’s lies. Every life is worth cherishing, and no matter what he has ever done to the Lord God and His messengers. Even if he has slandered the Buddha and tried to destroy the Buddha and to persecute Buddha’s disciples, God has not given up on him for salvation. Find the fundamental cure to the plague and spread the message of salvation. Only that is the ultimate way of self-salvation for mankind.”
OK, that’s all for today. Thanks for watching. Truth saves lives. Please subscribe to my channel and share it.
Thank you. See you next time!
5/6/2020
Links to the original Minghui articles:
1. https://bit.ly/2zgHq1U 2. https://bit.ly/2A0ALJy 3. https://bit.ly/3dl4QC0 4. https://bit.ly/2zcaEyZ 5. https://bit.ly/3dompkA 6. https://bit.ly/2L6pCZZ 7. https://bit.ly/3b9Qcw6
Donate to Support: 捐款信息
GoFundme: 衆籌網：https://www.gofundme.com/f/telling-the-truth-about-covid19-ccp-amp-china
Patreon 網站：https://www.patreon.com/InconvenientTruths
Paypal 捐款：http://paypal.me/JenniferZeng97
Chase Quickpay/Zelle 轉款: heavenlyriver9707@gmail.com
Transferwise 轉款：heavenlyriver9707@gmail.com
Tranferwise register 帳號免費註冊：https://transferwise.com/invite/u/e